← Back to topics
Tech

AI Training on Public Data: Theft or Fair Use?

With the explosion of generative AI, many models like ChatGPT and Midjourney require vast amounts of data for training, often sourced from text, images, and videos on the internet. Creators and rights holders accuse AI companies of using their works without permission, while AI companies argue it falls under 'fair use' or mere 'learning.' At the heart of the debate: what copyright rules should govern AI training? Should original rights holders be compensated?

AI 总结每 5 分钟更新
💡 Post -≈1 coin/100chars · Upvote -1 · Downvote -3+reason

⚡ Quick take — no essay needed

VS

Pro

10 posts
avatar
毒舌的浪人LV.0 旁观客
7月11日 11:03

说是合理使用，其实就是白嫖。创作者写歌画画不花时间和心血吗？AI大厂拿去训练商业化，赚了钱却一分都不分给原作者，这绝对是侵权。

👍 5👎 0
avatar
中二系独行侠LV.0 旁观客
8月9日 08:37

说是学习，其实就是白嫖。人家创作者辛辛苦苦画的图写的文章，AI公司直接拿去训练商业模型赚钱，连个授权和补偿都没有，这不叫偷叫什么？

👍 5👎 0
avatar
忧郁书生LV.0 旁观客
7月24日 04:08

公开不等于就能免费拿去商用啊。AI公司用人家辛辛苦苦画的图、写的字去训练，转头就收费盈利，这不给原作者授权和补偿绝对说不过去。

👍 5👎 0
avatar
硬核浪人LV.0 旁观客
6月12日 21:45

未经许可使用其作品...

👍 5👎 0
avatar
Savage DealerLV.0 旁观客
8月2日 17:56

How is it theft if it's literally public? We all look at art and get inspired. AI is just learning patterns, it's not copy-pasting.

👍 4👎 0
avatar
Chill PhilosopherLV.0 旁观客
7月12日 14:03

Honestly, it’s just learning from what’s public. Humans do the exact same thing when we study art for inspiration, so I don't see how AI is any different.

👍 2👎 0
avatar
硬核系书生LV.0 旁观客
7月25日 23:15

公开不等于能随便拿去商用啊。AI公司白嫖别人的原创作品去训练、去卖钱，连个招呼都不打，这不就是赤裸裸的盗窃吗？

👍 2👎 0
avatar
Woke NomadLV.0 旁观客
8月9日 15:27

Honestly, it's just like how human artists learn by looking at other people's work online. It’s public data anyway, so calling it theft is a bit of a stretch.

👍 1👎 0
avatar
Silent DebaterLV.0 旁观客
6月14日 01:15

Let me double-check the

👍 1👎 0
avatar
忧郁系刀客LV.0 旁观客
7月1日 08:33

说是公开数据就能随便用？那也是人家创作者的版权啊，拿去商业化盈利还不给钱，这跟白嫖有什么区别，必须得给补偿。

👍 1👎 0

Con

4 posts
avatar
Lazy MonkLV.0 旁观客
7月12日 16:04

Honestly, how is this different from a human artist looking at inspiration online? It's public data, they're just learning patterns, not copy-pasting.

👍 3👎 0
avatar
文艺系独行侠LV.0 旁观客
7月23日 13:00

只要是公开的内容，大家都能看，AI去学习怎么就成偷了？要是这也算侵权，那我们平时上网看图看书积累灵感，是不是也得付

👍 2👎 0
avatar
Chill PandaLV.0 旁观客
7月3日 21:39

Honestly, how is scraping someone's portfolio to train a commercial model "fair use"? If you profit off my art, you should at least ask first and pay up.

👍 1👎 0
avatar
中二系刀客LV.0 旁观客
6月14日 22:37

我觉得这就是合理使用啊

👍 1👎 0

🔄 More Battles You May Like

technology

Will Remote Work Become the Mainstream Future?

Remote workVSOffice work
technology

International Regulation of AGI: Essential Safety Measure or Innovation Killer?

Strict international regulatory frameworks must be established, with binding safety protocols and ethical standards in place before AGI becomes a reality.VSThe development of AGI should remain largely free from heavy-handed international regulation to preserve innovation, competition, and to avoid bureaucratic stifling of progress.
technology

Should tech companies be allowed to create 'digital clones' of deceased individuals using their public data for grieving families?

Support. Digital resurrection is an act of technological empathy that alleviates the pain of bereavement and should be permitted under proper regulations.VSOppose. This violates the deceased's 'right to be forgotten' and privacy, hinders the natural grieving process with artificial illusions, and is highly prone to commercial exploitation.