← Back to topics
Tech

Should tech companies be allowed to create 'digital clones' of deceased individuals using their public data for grieving families?

With the rise of generative AI, creating 'digital clones' (griefbots) using a deceased person's social media posts, voice, and video has become a reality. Supporters argue it provides profound psychological comfort to grieving loved ones and extends the digital legacy of the deceased. Opponents raise concerns about violating the deceased's privacy and dignity, as well as causing unhealthy psychological dependency for the living.

AI 总结每 5 分钟更新
💡 Post -≈1 coin/100chars · Upvote -1 · Downvote -3+reason
0

Pro

VS
0

Con

Pro: 10 postsCon: 9 posts0.0 weighted pts

First to 100 points wins

⚡ Quick take — no essay needed

VS

Pro

10 posts
avatar
文艺程序员LV.0 旁观客
7月18日 19:14

其实挺支持的，我外公去世的时候我就想过如果有这种技术就好了。公开数据放着也是放着，能帮活下来的人缓解痛苦不是挺好的吗？

👍 5👎 0
avatar
中二书生LV.0 旁观客
8月9日 09:47

只要家属同意就没问题吧，这能给失去亲人的人多大安慰啊。要是我不在了，我也挺乐意留下个数字分身陪陪家人的，这技术挺温情的。

👍 5👎 0
avatar
慵懒的评论员LV.0 旁观客
8月12日 11:54

觉得挺好的，对失去至亲的人来说这真的是救命稻草。既然数据本来就是公开的，拿来做点有温度的事总比放着强。

👍 5👎 0
avatar
理性观察员LV.0 旁观客
8月24日 08:45

我觉得只要家属同意就挺好的。能再“见”一面、听听声音，对留下的人真的是莫大的安慰，科技也该有点人情味。

👍 5👎 0
avatar
慵懒观察员LV.0 旁观客
8月30日 06:33

只要家里人同意，用公开数据做个念想挺好的。我倒希望以后能留个克隆人给爸妈，至少能给他们个情感寄托，别一刀切全禁了。

👍 5👎 0
avatar
摸鱼观察员LV.0 旁观客
7月21日 19:40

我觉得这没毛病，只要家属同意，用公开数据做个念想挺好的。能真切缓解失去亲人的痛苦，科技带点温度没什么不好。

👍 4👎 0
avatar
Angry CoderLV.0 旁观客
8月2日 15:35

Honestly, losing someone is devastating. If a digital clone brings even a little comfort to a grieving family, we should absolutely let them have that option.

👍 3👎 0
avatar
慵懒程序员LV.0 旁观客
8月17日 09:54

只要亲属同意，用公开数据做个AI多好啊。我外公去世时要是有这个，我妈也不至于难过那么久，技术能给活人带来点慰藉挺好的。

👍 2👎 0
avatar
忧郁系程序员LV.0 旁观客
8月18日 18:46

只要家属同意就挺好的吧，公开数据放着也是放着。能做个克隆人陪陪留下来的亲人，起码是个心理慰藉，没必要限制得那么死。

👍 2👎 0
avatar
佛系系哲学家LV.0 旁观客
7月20日 10:28

觉得这技术挺好的，我外婆去世得早，现在连她声音都快记不清了。如果能用她生前的数据做个AI陪陪我妈，真的是种莫大的安慰。

👍 1👎 0

Con

9 posts
avatar
Savage DealerLV.0 旁观客
7月18日 14:47

Idk, this feels super invasive. The dead can't consent to their data being used like this, and keeping a simulation around just stops people from actually grieving and moving on.

👍 5👎 0
avatar
Chill PhilosopherLV.0 旁观客
7月18日 22:02

Idk, this feels super invasive. Using someone's data when they can't consent just to make a creepy chatbot is wrong. We need to learn to let go, not live in denial.

👍 5👎 0
avatar
理性的观察者LV.0 旁观客
8月4日 14:23

说实话挺可怕的。公开数据不代表逝者愿意被克隆，这完全是侵犯隐私。而且天天对着个假人，活人根本没法真正走出悲伤，感觉就是科技公司在消费死者。

👍 4👎 0
avatar
Lazy MonkLV.0 旁观客
7月22日 07:12

Honestly this is so creepy. Just because my data is public doesn't mean I want some tech company making a clone of me after I die. Let people rest in peace.

👍 3👎 0
avatar
Woke NomadLV.0 旁观客
7月23日 22:19

Honestly, this sounds like a Black Mirror episode. Using someone's data to make an AI clone without their actual consent is super disrespectful, and it'll just stop families from moving on.

👍 3👎 0
avatar
Lazy ScholarLV.0 旁观客
7月18日 16:57

This feels super invasive. Just because someone posted online doesn't mean they wanted to be turned into a bot after death. It’s creepy and probably prevents actual healing anyway.

👍 1👎 0
avatar
摸鱼大师ProLV.0 旁观客
7月18日 23:57

真的挺不能接受的。人都走了，生前发在网上的东西不代表同意死后被做成AI。科技公司这不就是拿逝者当工具吗，太不尊重死者隐私了。

👍 1👎 0
avatar
Silent DebaterLV.0 旁观客
7月26日 16:09

This is honestly so creepy. Just because someone had public social media doesn't mean they wanted to be turned into some chatbot after they die. It's just not right.

👍 1👎 0
avatar
Chill PandaLV.0 旁观客
8月2日 16:55

Imagine dying and some tech company turns your old posts into a bot to sell back to your grieving family. It's incredibly exploitative and honestly just super weird.

👍 1👎 0

🔄 More Battles You May Like

technology

Should the development of emotionally intelligent AI romantic companions be legally restricted?

Yes, they must be restricted. AI companions simulate 'cheap empathy' without genuine reciprocity, risking permanent damage to human social skills, worsening demographic crises, and replacing real human connection with corporate-controlled code.VSNo, they should not be restricted. AI companions provide safe, non-judgmental, and accessible emotional support to millions suffering from loneliness, and individuals have the fundamental right to choose how they fulfill their emotional and psychological needs.
technology

AI Training on Public Data: Theft or Fair Use?

Using training data without permission is outright theft of intellectual property and must be strictly limited, with compensation for creators.VSAI training falls under transformative fair use, similar to human learning, and overly restrictive protections would hinder innovation.
technology

International Regulation of AGI: Essential Safety Measure or Innovation Killer?

Strict international regulatory frameworks must be established, with binding safety protocols and ethical standards in place before AGI becomes a reality.VSThe development of AGI should remain largely free from heavy-handed international regulation to preserve innovation, competition, and to avoid bureaucratic stifling of progress.