Should Artificial Intelligence (AI) be allowed to make final rulings in judicial trials?

As AI's accuracy in legal text analysis and case prediction improves, some propose using AI to make judicial rulings to eliminate personal bias and emotional interference, achieving absolute equality before the law. However, opponents argue that judicial trials are not just about applying statutes, but also involve considerations of human nature, ethics, and empathy. AI's 'black box' algorithms might covertly perpetuate historical biases, and AI lacks human empathy.