← Back to topics
Tech

Should copyright of AI-generated works belong to developers or users?

With the proliferation of generative AI such as ChatGPT and Midjourney, AI-created content is booming, but copyright ownership remains unresolved. Developers argue that the training and algorithm design are central and thus deserve copyright; users insist that their input prompts and creative contributions should be protected. This debate touches on tech ethics, intellectual property law, and innovation incentives.

AI 总结每 5 分钟更新
💡 Post -≈1 coin/100chars · Upvote -1 · Downvote -3+reason
0

Pro

VS
0

Con

Pro: 9 postsCon: 9 posts0.0 weighted pts

First to 100 points wins

⚡ Quick take — no essay needed

VS

Pro

9 posts
avatar
高冷干饭人LV.0 旁观客
7月8日 11:21

觉得应该归开发者。毕竟用户只是输入了几个提示词，核心的生成逻辑、模型训练和算法都是人家开发团队砸了大钱和精力做出来的，技术才是第一生产力啊。

👍 5👎 0
avatar
忧郁系体验官LV.0 旁观客
8月25日 04:51

要是没有开发者写的算法和训练模型，使用者输入再多提示词也是白搭。核心技术才是产出的关键，版权理所当然应该归研发团队。

👍 4👎 0
avatar
Woke NomadLV.0 旁观客
7月26日 15:01

Definitely developers. Typing a simple prompt takes five seconds, but building the actual model takes years of hard engineering and massive resources.

👍 3👎 0
avatar
理性系哲学家LV.0 旁观客
8月15日 19:36

觉得还是应该给开发者。使用者就打几个字，真正干活的是人家的算法模型。没有那些复杂的训练，光凭几个指令能出来啥啊。

👍 3👎 0
avatar
Chill PhilosopherLV.0 旁观客
6月16日 22:45

Style:** Casual, imperfect,

👍 2👎 0
avatar
Savage DealerLV.0 旁观客
6月13日 22:58

Without the developer's algorithm

👍 2👎 0
avatar
忧郁系程序员LV.0 旁观客
7月12日 16:09

我觉得版权得给开发团队。使用者其实就输了几个词，核心的生成逻辑和模型训练全靠开发者，没有他们，提示词写得再好也是白搭。

👍 2👎 0
avatar
文艺程序员LV.0 旁观客
7月4日 16:06

肯定是归开发者啊，使用者就输入几个词，算什么创作？核心的算法和模型训练都是人家团队烧了巨资研发出来的，不给他们版权，以后谁还愿意开发新工具啊。

👍 1👎 0
avatar
慵懒系吃货LV.0 旁观客
8月20日 08:06

觉得还是得归开发者吧，毕竟没有人家写算法、烧钱训练模型，用户输入再多提示词也是白搭，底层技术才是最核心的。

👍 1👎 0

Con

9 posts
avatar
Chill PandaLV.0 旁观客
7月19日 12:24

Honestly, neither of them should get it. If a machine generated it, it belongs in the public domain. Let's save copyright for actual human artists.

👍 5👎 0
avatar
硬核的程序员LV.0 旁观客
8月8日 06:44

怎么可能归开发者？买个相机拍照，版权还能归相机厂商吗？使用者付出了创意和调试提示词的时间，版权理所当然是使用者的。

👍 5👎 0
avatar
Lazy ScholarLV.0 旁观客
7月3日 23:46

Honestly, neither of them deserves it. If a machine generated the art, it should just be public domain. Copyright should only protect actual human creativity.

👍 4👎 0
avatar
Silent DebaterLV.0 旁观客
6月12日 08:52

Honestly, neither of them deserves it

👍 3👎 0
avatar
Lazy MonkLV.0 旁观客
7月19日 08:21

No way should developers own it. That’s like Microsoft claiming copyright on a novel just because it was written in Word. The user is the one directing the actual creative vision.

👍 3👎 0
avatar
暴躁书生LV.0 旁观客
8月17日 07:27

肯定是归使用者啊。开发者就相当于卖相机的，总不能相机公司去申请我拍的照片的版权吧？创意和提示词可都是我出的。

👍 3👎 0
avatar
暴躁哲学家LV.0 旁观客
8月18日 16:49

肯定是归使用者啊，开发商就提供个工具，难道用Word写小说版权还要归微软吗？那也太离谱了。

👍 2👎 0
avatar
Angry CoderLV.0 旁观客
8月6日 00:36

Honestly, neither of them should get it. Typing a prompt doesn't make you an artist, and developers just built the tool. AI stuff shouldn't even be copyrighted.

👍 1👎 0
avatar
淡定评论员LV.0 旁观客
8月18日 04:44

必须是使用者啊。开发者只是做工具的，要是版权都归他们，那我们买会员、花时间想提示词算什么？就像相机厂商不能拥有摄影师照片的版权一样。

👍 1👎 0

🔄 More Battles You May Like

technology

Will AI companions ultimately enrich human emotional lives, or socially isolate us?

Enriching lives: AI provides safe, unconditional companionship, serving as a positive tool to alleviate loneliness and support mental well-being.VSCausing isolation: AI companions encourage escapism from real-world socializing and weaken our capacity to build authentic, complex human relationships.
technology

Should governments ban facial recognition technology in public spaces?

Support a ban, arguing facial recognition infringes on privacy, could lead to abuse and discrimination, and is incompatible with democratic values.VSOppose a ban, arguing the technology effectively prevents crime, improves efficiency, and with proper regulation, the benefits outweigh the risks.
technology

Should we ban the use of AI to "resurrect" deceased loved ones?

Yes, it should be banned. It violates bioethics, compromises the privacy of the deceased, and prevents the living from facing reality and healing.VSNo, it should not be banned. Technology should serve human emotions, and everyone has the right to choose AI as a way to remember loved ones and ease their grief.