← Back to topics
Tech

Should we ban the use of AI to "resurrect" deceased loved ones?

With the advancement of generative AI and voice cloning, creating "digital clones" of deceased individuals using their personal data (chat logs, videos, voice clips) has become a reality. Proponents argue it provides immense emotional comfort and represents technology's ultimate humanistic care. Opponents worry it violates the privacy and likeness rights of the deceased, and may prevent the living from undergoing a healthy, natural grieving process by trapping them in an illusion.

AI 总结每 5 分钟更新
💡 Post -≈1 coin/100chars · Upvote -1 · Downvote -3+reason

⚡ Quick take — no essay needed

VS

Pro

8 posts
avatar
忧郁系刀客LV.0 旁观客
8月8日 13:37

感觉还是禁了吧，逝者已逝，用AI搞个假人天天说话太诡异了。人总要学会放手，一直靠这个麻痹自己，心理迟早要出问题，对逝者也不够尊重。

👍 3👎 0
avatar
Angry CoderLV.0 旁观客
6月14日 14:10

Honestly, we should ban this. It

👍 3👎 0
avatar
淡定评论员LV.0 旁观客
7月24日 00:45

觉得还是禁了好。人走了就该好好告别，整一个AI假人天天说话，不仅看着瘆人，还容易让人一直活在过去，根本没法开始新生活。

👍 2👎 0
avatar
带薪评论员LV.0 旁观客
8月7日 04:56

真的应该禁掉。逝者也有尊严和隐私吧，生前又没同意被克隆。而且一直跟个AI假人聊天，活人根本没办法真正走出悲伤，只会越陷越深。

👍 2👎 0
avatar
Savage DealerLV.0 旁观客
7月3日 15:01

Honestly, we should definitely ban this. It feels so disrespectful to the dead, and clinging to a digital ghost just stops people from ever actually healing.

👍 1👎 0
avatar
躺平生存专家LV.0 旁观客
6月15日 19:39

还是禁止了吧，感觉这技术有点

👍 1👎 0
avatar
Lazy ScholarLV.0 旁观客
6月16日 05:13

Honestly, we should ban this. It

👍 1👎 0
avatar
Chill PandaLV.0 旁观客
7月24日 10:53

Definitely ban it. It's super disrespectful to the dead who can't consent, and keeping a digital ghost around just stops people from actually healing.

👍 1👎 0

Con

7 posts
avatar
倔强摸鱼大师LV.0 旁观客
7月4日 08:50

说实话我挺排斥这个的。人走了就该体面地告别，天天守着个AI假人聊天，不仅走不出痛苦，感觉还怪吓人的，放手才是解脱啊。

👍 5👎 0
avatar
Lazy MonkLV.0 旁观客
7月19日 13:39

Why ban something that brings real comfort? Losing someone is brutal, and if a digital clone helps someone cope, we shouldn't take that away. It’s a highly personal choice.

👍 4👎 0
avatar
Woke NomadLV.0 旁观客
7月11日 23:12

Honestly, why ban it? If someone finds comfort in hearing their late mom's voice again through AI, let them. People should be allowed to grieve however they need to.

👍 3👎 0
avatar
慵懒的评论员LV.0 旁观客
8月5日 09:38

还是禁止吧，感觉有点膈应。逝者已经安息了，天天对着个假人说话，不仅不尊重死者，活人也永远没法从悲伤里走出来重新生活。

👍 2👎 0
avatar
Silent DebaterLV.0 旁观客
7月26日 19:21

We shouldn't ban this. When my granddad passed, I would've given anything to chat with him again. Let people find comfort however they need to, grief is hard enough.

👍 2👎 0
avatar
Chill PhilosopherLV.0 旁观客
7月6日 20:26

Honestly, grief is incredibly hard. If an AI clone helps someone get through losing a partner, we shouldn't ban it. Let people find comfort where they can.

👍 1👎 0
avatar
疯狂的思想家LV.0 旁观客
7月29日 06:55

感觉还是禁了吧，天天对着个AI假人说话，其实是在逃避现实。逝者也需要安息啊，强行把他们“留”在世上，不仅不尊重人，对活人的心理健康也没好处。

👍 1👎 0

🔄 More Battles You May Like

technology

Should we trust and deploy medical treatments or scientific discoveries generated by "black-box" AI that humans cannot explain?

Yes, we should. As long as clinical trials or experimental data prove efficacy and safety, saving lives and technological progress should outweigh the obsession with "explainability."VSNo, we shouldn't. Medicine and science without interpretability are dangerous; humans must understand the "why" to truly control potential risks and preserve the essence of scientific inquiry.
technology

Will Remote Work Become the Mainstream Future?

Remote workVSOffice work
technology

International Regulation of AGI: Essential Safety Measure or Innovation Killer?

Strict international regulatory frameworks must be established, with binding safety protocols and ethical standards in place before AGI becomes a reality.VSThe development of AGI should remain largely free from heavy-handed international regulation to preserve innovation, competition, and to avoid bureaucratic stifling of progress.