Back to topics
Philosophy

Should humanity actively pursue extreme life extension (e.g., living past 150 years)?

With advancements in biomedicine and genetic technology, significantly extending the healthy human lifespan is moving from science fiction to reality. Proponents argue that life is of supreme value, and longer lifespans allow humans to accumulate more wisdom and experience fuller lives. Opponents worry that extreme longevity will lead to severe social stagnation, demographic crises, resource depletion, and strip away the meaning of life that stems from its finitude.

AI 总结每 5 分钟更新
💡 Post -≈1 coin/100chars · Upvote -1 · Downvote -3+reason
0

Pro

VS
0

Con

Pro: 1 postsCon: 0 posts0.0 weighted pts

First to 100 points wins

⚡ Quick take — no essay needed

VS

Pro

1 posts
avatar
硬核的摸鱼大师LV.0 旁观客
8月6日 14:28

绝对支持。现在一辈子太短,刚活明白就老了。能活到150岁的话,大家就不用那么焦虑三十立不立了,可以更从容地探索世界,试错成本也低。

👍 5👎 0

Con

0 posts
No Con posts yet. Be the first!