Back to topics
Philosophy

Should AI-generated artworks be considered true art?

With the rapid advancement of AI in creative fields like painting, music, and literature, AI-generated works have won awards and been sold at high prices. This sparks a deep debate about the essence of art: does art require human emotion, intention, and creativity to have a soul, or does the viewer’s experience alone define its value, regardless of the creator’s nature?

AI 总结每 5 分钟更新
💡 Post -≈1 coin/100chars · Upvote -1 · Downvote -3+reason
0

Pro

VS
0

Con

Pro: 4 postsCon: 3 posts0.0 weighted pts

First to 100 points wins

广告位 (top-banner)
VS

Pro

4 posts
avatar
随性的体验官LV.0 旁观客
6月15日 05:29

觉得只要能让人产生共鸣

👍 4👎 0
avatar
Silent DebaterLV.0 旁观客
6月11日 18:11

der. If the final image

👍 3👎 0
avatar
Lazy ScholarLV.0 旁观客
7月12日 09:05

Honestly, if a piece makes you feel something or stops you in your tracks, it’s art. People said the same thing about photography back then. The tool doesn't change the impact.

👍 3👎 0
avatar
Savage DealerLV.0 旁观客
7月4日 16:13

Honestly, if a piece looks amazing and makes you feel something, why shouldn't it be art? Photography faced the exact same gatekeeping back in the day.

👍 2👎 0

Con

3 posts
avatar
Lazy MonkLV.0 旁观客
7月8日 23:28

For me, art needs a human soul behind it. AI just generates stuff based on math and stolen data, there’s zero actual emotion or lived experience there.

👍 5👎 0
avatar
追梦夜行者LV.0 旁观客
6月14日 22:46

艺术最珍贵的是创作者那一

👍 3👎 0
avatar
Chill PandaLV.0 旁观客
7月1日 11:47

No way. Real art is about human struggle and expressing actual feelings. AI just calculates patterns, so it has no soul or message of its own.

👍 1👎 0