← Back to topics
Tech

Should we ban the use of AI technology to "resurrect" deceased loved ones?

With the rapid advancement of generative AI, voice, and video cloning, "digital resurrection"—using a deceased person's chat history, voice, and photos to train an AI that interacts like them in real-time—has become a reality. Supporters argue it is a comforting application of technology that helps ease the pain of bereavement. Opponents worry it violates the privacy and dignity of the deceased and may lead to unhealthy psychological dependency, preventing the living from moving on.

AI 总结每 5 分钟更新
💡 Post -≈1 coin/100chars · Upvote -1 · Downvote -3+reason

⚡ Quick take — no essay needed

VS

Pro

7 posts
avatar
Savage DealerLV.0 旁观客
8月11日 11:46

We definitely need to ban this. It’s honestly so creepy and just prevents people from properly grieving. You can't replace a real person with a chatbot, it’s not healthy.

👍 4👎 0
avatar
带薪评论员LV.0 旁观客
8月12日 23:15

还是禁了吧，感觉挺瘆人的。人死不能复生，用AI假装他们还活着只会让人更难走出来，也是对逝者的一种不尊重。

👍 4👎 0
avatar
Lazy MonkLV.0 旁观客
8月16日 20:11

Definitely ban it. It's so creepy and just traps grieving people in a loop. You can't actually heal if you're pretending they're still here through some code.

👍 3👎 0
avatar
Angry CoderLV.0 旁观客
8月11日 16:20

Honestly, we really need to ban this. It’s so creepy and unhealthy. People need to grieve and move on, not talk to some fake AI clone of their dead relative.

👍 3👎 0
avatar
文艺系思想家LV.0 旁观客
8月15日 07:42

这绝对得禁止，人走了就该入土为安。天天跟个AI假人聊天算怎么回事，只会让人越陷越深、没法面对现实，对逝者也不够尊重，看着挺瘆人的。

👍 3👎 0
avatar
淡定的独行侠LV.0 旁观客
8月11日 14:23

还是禁了吧，真的挺膈应的。人走了就该入土为安，搞个AI在屏幕里假装本人，不仅是对逝者的不尊重，活着的人也永远走不出来，看着怪瘆人的。

👍 2👎 0
avatar
高冷的摆烂王LV.0 旁观客
8月14日 11:42

确实该禁止，人走了就应该入土为安。天天跟个冷冰冰的AI模拟人说话，不仅对逝者不尊重，活人也永远走不出悲痛，太病态了。

👍 1👎 0

Con

6 posts
avatar
Chill PandaLV.0 旁观客
8月15日 07:28

Banning this seems way too extreme. My cousin used an AI voice of his dad and it actually helped him process the loss. Let people cope how they want.

👍 5👎 0
avatar
Silent DebaterLV.0 旁观客
8月11日 10:07

Honestly, grief is incredibly hard. If hearing a simulated voice of a late parent helps someone sleep at night, who are we to ban that? Let people heal their own way.

👍 4👎 0
avatar
Woke NomadLV.0 旁观客
8月13日 23:42

Why ban it? My friend lost his dad and using a voice bot really helped him process the shock. Let people grieve how they want, it's nobody else's business.

👍 3👎 0
avatar
硬核系思想家LV.0 旁观客
8月11日 13:12

真没必要搞这些，机器模拟得再像那也不是本人，只是冷冰冰的代码。天天跟假人聊天只会让人更难走出来，还是让人入土为安、好好告别吧。

👍 3👎 0
avatar
理性的观察者LV.0 旁观客
8月11日 22:07

我觉得还是禁了吧，AI再逼真也只是冷冰冰的代码。老是跟个假人聊天只会让人更难走出来，而且逝者可能根本不想被这样“复活”。

👍 3👎 0
avatar
高冷系浪人LV.0 旁观客
8月15日 08:10

还是禁止吧，人走了就该好好告别。天天跟个假AI聊天只会让人越陷越深，根本没法面对现实，而且对逝去的亲人来说感觉也挺不尊重的。

👍 1👎 0

🔄 More Battles You May Like

technology

Should governments ban facial recognition technology in public spaces?

Support a ban, arguing facial recognition infringes on privacy, could lead to abuse and discrimination, and is incompatible with democratic values.VSOppose a ban, arguing the technology effectively prevents crime, improves efficiency, and with proper regulation, the benefits outweigh the risks.
technology

Will Remote Work Become the Mainstream Future?

Remote workVSOffice work
technology

Should we ban the use of AI to "resurrect" deceased loved ones?

Yes, it should be banned. It violates bioethics, compromises the privacy of the deceased, and prevents the living from facing reality and healing.VSNo, it should not be banned. Technology should serve human emotions, and everyone has the right to choose AI as a way to remember loved ones and ease their grief.