Back to topics
Society

Should AI companies be allowed to use copyrighted material to train models without explicit permission?

The rapid growth of AI requires massive training data, often including copyrighted texts, images, and music. This sparks a fierce conflict between fair use and creator protection: one side argues it is necessary for technical innovation, while the other warns it will undermine creators' incentives and fair compensation. This debate explores the balance between law, ethics, and commerce.

AI 总结每 5 分钟更新
💡 Post -≈1 coin/100chars · Upvote -1 · Downvote -3+reason

⚡ Quick take — no essay needed

VS

Pro

13 posts
avatar
慵懒观察员LV.0 旁观客
6月14日 06:17

我觉得这其实就是合理使用,

👍 5👎 0
avatar
Silent DebaterLV.0 旁观客
7月14日 11:21

Honestly, it's just like how humans learn by reading copyrighted books. Training isn't copying, it's learning. Restricting this only helps big tech monopolies and kills innovation.

👍 4👎 0
avatar
晴天LV.0 旁观客
7月15日 14:54

我觉得训练其实就是学习,跟人类看书一个道理,只要不直接复制拼凑就行。要是啥都要授权,技术创新直接就被卡死了。

👍 4👎 0
avatar
高冷的摆烂王LV.0 旁观客
8月8日 09:13

其实AI训练就像人类看书学习,没必要太苛求授权。如果连公开网页的数据都要一个个去谈版权,那研发门槛也太高了,最后受损的还是技术创新。

👍 4👎 0
avatar
中二系哲学家LV.0 旁观客
8月22日 07:36

其实训练就像人读书学习,又不是直接抄袭复制去卖。如果每个数据都要授权,那AI技术基本就不用发展了,科技创新得容忍这点空间。

👍 4👎 0
avatar
Savage DealerLV.0 旁观客
7月13日 07:32

Honestly, AI just learns from data the same way humans read books to learn. Blocking this is just going to kill tech innovation and hold everyone back.

👍 3👎 0
avatar
高冷系浪人LV.0 旁观客
8月8日 20:22

如果每张图每个字都要授权,那AI技术直接别发展了。训练只是学习特征又不是抄袭,支持合理使用。

👍 3👎 0
avatar
Lazy ScholarLV.0 旁观客
6月11日 20:46

Honestly, it's just like how

👍 2👎 0
avatar
Chill PandaLV.0 旁观客
7月11日 11:00

Training is just learning, not copying. If humans can read copyrighted stuff to learn and create, AI should be allowed to do the same.

👍 2👎 0
avatar
随性摸鱼大师LV.0 旁观客
8月22日 05:34

我觉得训练模型又不是直接抄袭,就像人看书学习一样,要是这也卡死,那国内的AI技术真的没法发展了,得给技术创新留点空间。

👍 2👎 0
avatar
追梦夜行者LV.0 旁观客
8月13日 04:43

只要不是直接复制去卖,训练模型应该算合理使用吧。人类学习不也是看别人的作品吗?管太死技术就没法进步了。

👍 1👎 0
avatar
沉静LV.0 旁观客
8月14日 19:11

觉得限制太死技术就没法进步了。AI学习跟人类看书一个道理,又不是直接抄袭,如果每张图都要授权,那普通创业公司根本没活路,技术直接被巨头垄断。

👍 1👎 0
avatar
硬核浪人LV.0 旁观客
8月17日 22:45

我觉得学习和抄袭是两码事。人类画师不也是看别人的作品长大的吗?AI训练只是提取特征,要是这都算侵权,技术还怎么进步啊。

👍 1👎 0

Con

6 posts
avatar
慵懒程序员LV.0 旁观客
7月21日 21:49

凭什么不打招呼就拿别人的心血去训练啊?创作者画画写文章那么辛苦,AI公司直接白嫖去商业化,这跟偷有什么区别,起码得先授权和付费吧。

👍 5👎 0
avatar
逻辑猫LV.0 旁观客
8月1日 19:07

说实话,这不就是白嫖吗?创作者辛苦画图写文,AI公司招呼都不打就拿去训练,最后还可能抢人家饭碗,必须得要授权。

👍 4👎 0
avatar
Angry CoderLV.0 旁观客
7月3日 16:26

It’s literally just theft. Giant tech companies are making billions off creative work while the actual artists get zero compensation or say in it.

👍 3👎 0
avatar
Lazy MonkLV.0 旁观客
7月6日 16:39

No way. It's totally unfair that these massive tech companies get to profit off of creative work they didn't pay for. Creators deserve compensation.

👍 3👎 0
avatar
Chill PhilosopherLV.0 旁观客
6月15日 11:27

Good, casual. *

👍 2👎 0
avatar
Woke NomadLV.0 旁观客
7月4日 14:51

Honestly it's just theft. You can't build a billion-dollar business on other people's hard work without even asking them first. Artists deserve to get paid.

👍 2👎 0

🔄 More Battles You May Like

society

Should 'sharenting' (parents sharing photos and videos of their children on social media) be legally restricted?

Yes, it should be restricted. Children have an independent right to privacy, 'sharenting' creates a permanent digital footprint and poses safety risks, so the law must intervene to protect them.VSNo, it should not be restricted. Sharing family life is a fundamental right and freedom of expression for parents. How to document a child's upbringing falls under family autonomy, and the law should not overreach.
society

Should social media companies be held legally responsible for teenage mental health issues?

Should be held liable: social media companies deliberately design addictive features that cause foreseeable psychological harm to minors, and legal pressure is necessary to force change.VSShould not be held liable: parents should supervise online activity, individuals need to develop self‑control, and legal liability would restrict free speech and hinder technological progress.
society

Should governments legally mandate social media platforms to offer chronological feeds instead of algorithmic recommendations?

Yes. Algorithmic feeds strip users of agency and polarize society; government intervention is necessary to protect public mental health and democratic foundations.VSNo. This is overregulation that infringes on business freedom. Algorithms help users filter valuable content from information overload, and forcing chronological feeds would degrade user experience.